In the latest development of the high-profile case involving 18-year-old activist Hamdiyya Sidi Sharif, the Sokoto Chief Magistrates’ Court has adjourned proceedings to March 13 and 14, 2025. This decision, announced on February 22, 2025, by Chief Magistrate Faruk Umar, came after the Police Prosecutor, Inspector Khalid Musa, presented evidence through the Investigating Police Officer (IPO), Tukur Abdulhadi. The prosecution alleges that Hamdiyya disseminated content capable of inciting public disturbance, particularly criticizing the government’s handling of banditry in regions like Sabon Birnin Daji. During the session, the IPO submitted a flash drive and a translated version of Hamdiyya’s statement as exhibits. However, under cross-examination, it was revealed that her statement was taken without legal representation present. The court has maintained the bail conditions previously granted to Hamdiyya.
The case has ignited a firestorm of discussions across social media platforms, with users expressing a spectrum of opinions:
Many view her as a courageous voice against governmental negligence. One user emphasized the threats she has faced since her critical post about the Sokoto State governor. Â
Some users argue that the state’s response to Hamdiyya’s activism is a direct threat to free speech. A commentator noted that actions against critics like Hamdiyya are not only threats to free speech but also a sign of weakness.Â
The manner of her arraignment has also been a point of contention. Reports indicate that she was secretly arraigned by the Sokoto State government, raising questions about the transparency of the legal process.Â
The adjournment of Hamdiyya Sidi Sharif’s trial has intensified discussions about freedom of expression and governmental accountability in Nigeria. As the new court dates approach, the case continues to serve as a focal point for debates on the rights of individuals to voice dissent and the responsibilities of authorities to uphold democratic principles.
